Clinics In Brampton That Does Abortion

Symposium Presentation tribute - inventory

"Sociology of the ruling classes

issues and renewals of problematic"

Symposium in honor of Monique and Michel Charlot Nip-Nip

13 and January 14, 2011 - Paris

University Paris Dauphine - Salle Raymond Aron

Days co-organized by the RT sociology of elites "of the AFS

the LaSSP the IEP of Toulouse, Amiens and CURAPP IRISSO of Paris-Dauphine

"Officers", "captains of industry", "responsible policies, top managers "Think tanks", "influential intellectuals" ... Land and analyze sociological happy members of the ruling classes but distinctly. The "big bourgeoisie" or, if one prefers, "the ruling classes" appear somewhat like an object of right, even if only to question the relevance of the concept of cause and the group to try to understand extent to which its members could overcome the issues, rules and boundaries between different fields also allowed activities.

tireless "investigators from the bourgeoisie and aristocracy, "Monique Nip-Nip Charlot and Michel are without doubt among the few researchers have resolutely tried to explain in detail the operation of this social group" whose position is defined by the possession of means of production, which can be combined with the exercise of economic power, as CEO for example, but that may well settle for a rentier attitude, whether or not an occupation "(2000).

A symposium on the sociology of the dominant classes "offers the opportunity to salute the work done by these two sociologists in favor of the state of play on the classical work, ongoing and future on the big bourgeoisie French or international, on its social base, its social foundations but also on its lines of cleavage and the possible dividing lines that cross the different fractions of the "summits of society".

Organizing Committee:

Eric Darras (LaSSP) François-Xavier Dudouet (IRISSO) Julien Fretel (CURAPP) Sylvain Laurens (Gresco-GSPE)

FIRST HALF-DAY

Sociology of "Meeting Places":

inauguration, consecration, eviction ...

* Morning of January 13 *

9:00 am to 9:30 am: Introduction of the symposium

Eric Darras, François Xavier Dudouet, Julien Fretel & Sylvain Laurens

meeting places can be understood in a double sense. On the one hand, it is to report on the operation of places or institutions supporting the development of specific forms of entresoi ensuring the reproduction of the bourgeoisie (rituals, colleges, clubs closed, but also more mundane entresoi widely club makers, Davos summits type ...). On the other hand, and appreciate the continuity of a reflexive perspective consistent with Monique and Michel Charlot Nip-Nip, "travel in upper class" poses a particularly acute issue of complexity and specificity of exchanges taking place between investigators and respondents. Work on the high society are even rarer than the upper middle class "is in compliance with" the investigation in the social sciences. How the sociologist can then "meet" the elites, by what methods (worldly exploration of directories, interviews, ethnographic participant ...)? This first half day revolves around two roundtables. The first returns to be canonical "big school" and socialization. The second the notion of entresoi.

Roundtable No. 1 (9:30 / 11:00)

Large schools between venues and forums reproduction

- Chair / Discussion: Bénédicte Bertin Mourot (CNRS / LISE)

- Jules Naudet (CSOs CNRS Sciences Po) "Becoming dominant: the discovery of otherness to the internalization of social norms legitimate "

- Paul Pasquali (ENS-ETT), " Places and temporalities of the mobilization of the dominant classes for the opening of schools. A symposium rue d'Ulm. "

- Stephanie Charriere-Grousset (CERTOP TLM), "The final clubs: the socialization of the dominant classes to the secret U.S."

Roundtable No. 2 (11.00 / 12.30)

entresois Survey: back on a sociological notion

- Chair / Discussion : Monique de Saint Martin (EHESS)

- Gildas Tanguy (IEP Toulouse - Lassp), The Association of Directors Prefectural : internalize the rites of great body of State, to cultivate a "one's own" and learn his role as prefect of the Republic (1907-1940)

- Sylvain Laurens, (University of Limoges - Gresco / GSPE), "The entresoi as a place of internal differentiations: polarity principles and opposition in a private club of the European district of Brussels'

- Bruno Cousin (Lille 1) and Sébastien Chauvin (Amsterdam ), "The between self-elite Saint-Barthélemy (Antilles)"

SECOND HALF DAY

"Notables, employers, contractors, managers "

Organization and collectivism practice of bourgeois economic

* Afternoon * 13 January

The second day will be devoted to contemporary forms of economic organization of the bourgeoisie and management . It is an opportunity to take stock of ongoing work in this burgeoning field surveys on "economic elite" but also try to highlight the "blind spots" or boundaries of the current work on these issues there . The second half day was thinking along two axes. All First, a series of interventions around how we can make history or sociology of business organizations, then a reflection on the articulation of modes of legitimation of organization among employers locally and nationally.

Roundtable No. 3 (2:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.)

"The employers are: organizations, representations"

- Presidency meeting / discussion: Catherine Bidou (Univ. Dauphine)

- Offerlé Michel (ENS), "Activists CAC 40? Elements of the sociology of business organizations "

- Daniele Fraboulet (Paris 13)," The mobilization of employers: the example of metallurgy. "

- Caveng Remy (University of Amiens - CURAPP), "E. A Sellière, Herald spite of himself? The construction of the legitimacy of EA Sellière head of MEDEF "

   -     Daniel Gaxie  and  Hubé  Nicolas (Paris 1 / cesspit)," The field of power and European integration "   

- Jean Finez (Lille 1 - Clersé)," Strategies of Marriage and entrepreneurial middle class family textile : The Tiberghien Tourcoing "

- Hervé Joly (CNRS / LARHRA)," The Rise and conversions of a "big family" Industrial Example of Gillet in Lyon

THIRD HALF DAY

A class mobilized

Morning of January 14 * *

The third half- day will focus on ways organization and mobilization of the big bourgeoisie. Defense Organizations owners, defense organization of a particular area, or use the courtroom to the media, political participation and mobilization, voting, lobbying ... This roundtable will of course speak for researchers working on institutions for advocacy class of the bourgeoisie in their economic and spatial dimensions. But it will also be forms of mobilization more localized and less durable of these groups against the state or "in state" tax avoidance, negotiations on rankings in "historical" landmark report of the big bourgeoisie to "great schools" ... Contributions highlighting the relationship between partisan institutions, trade union activists and upper middle class or more generally the relationship between the state and the social group are also presented.

Roundtable No. 4 (8.30 / 10.00)

Money Matters: maintenance and protection of economic assets

- Presidency meeting / discussion: Julien Fretel (Amiens / CURAPP)

- Quemin Alain (Paris Est), "The commissioners managers of companies auctioneers auction: terms and effects of elite mobilization. "

- Valerie Larrosa (IEP Toulouse / Lassp)," transmission, preservation, enhancement of economic assets: uses and manipulation law by the dominant. "

- Alexis Spire (CNRS CERAPS), "A large bourgeois facing tax audit: report to the tax ruling classes"

- Geoffrey Geuens (University of Liège), "The small world of Belgian companies: Boards, inbreeding and" collectivism practice ""

Roundtable No. 5 (10h00/11h30)

fiefs and spatial mobilizations of the bourgeoisie

- Presidency meeting / discussion: Frédéric Lebaron (Amiens / CURAPP)

- Sylvie Tissot (Univ. Strasbourg / GSPE), " Interest Relief at higher layers: Love and control of diversity in a gentrified neighborhood of Boston."

- Celine Bessière (Paris-Dauphine, IRISSO), "The study of the bourgeoisie: an analytical model to study the family wine business transfers.

- Eric Agrikoliansky , Jerome Heurtaux and Brigitte Grignou (Paris Dauphine / IRISSO), "A class mobilized? Campaign 2008 municipal elections in the sixteenth arrondissement Paris. "

Roundtable No. 6 (11:30 to 13:00),

" A classroom without borders? Report to the National

and transnational ruling classes "

- Presidency meeting / discussion: Jean-Pascal Daloz (CNRS, Oxford)

- Anne Catherine Wagner (Paris 1), "Circulation and international elites: the concept of capital cosmopolitan

- Didier Georgakakis (IEP Strasbourg / GSPE) The end of a transnational Stand? European officials dealing with international managerialism

- Maryse Ramambason-Vauchelles (GSPE / CERCEC) The "Novarichs" Birth of a new Russian bourgeoisie?

FOURTH HALF DAY

"The reception of a work round-trips between subjects and objects"

Afternoon tribute Monique and Michel Charlot Nip-Nip

* Afternoon January 14 *

From 14h30 to 19h,

- Presidency meeting / discussion: Eric Darras (IEP Toulouse / Lassp)

This last round table, the organizers have decided to exclude from the call for papers to be able to invite those who have had the opportunity to cross paths with Charlie and Monique Nip- Michel Pinçon will provide an opportunity to revisit a triple acceptance of work from the latter: first with their "respondents favored" without whom nothing would have been possible then with journalists who have contributed differently to recovery more or less "successful" in their work, and finally with the Readers invited to this opportunity to take an active part in the debate and symposium. The idea is to initiate a free and open discussion, probably more informal, with everyone, including volunteers, Nip-Charlot, Monique and Michel Pinçon have met and with whom, for various reasons, they have established links both emotional and intellectual.

* * *

How To Use Openkore Poseidon

com Call Congress AFS Policy

Thematic Network "Sociology of elites
Call for Papers
Congress of the AFS - "Building (s) and innovation (s)"
Grenoble - July 2011

The standard textbooks of sociology remind any-e-e sociologist beginning: between fascination for the subject "and" all-round denunciation, "the sociology of the bourgeoisie or ruling class often runs the risk of passing" near "its object. Between "tax effect" and "symbolic violence", the risk is probably intensified when analyzing the report "elites" (a concept that may invite to naturalize the dominant social positions) to " creation and innovation "(two words that evoke" change "but what can regularly mobilize social actors to legitimize their positions and their immediate interests yet constant).
To circumvent this epistemological double trap, the choice was made to decline our call for papers in three axes. In the first area, we invite participants to the discourse on creation and innovation for the object. In the latter two areas, we invite participants to consider the terms "innovation" and "creation" as synonymous with "transformation" or "objective changes" observed by the sociologist.

Axis 1 "Innovation", "ethics", "environment", "social economy" ...: new forms of legitimation of entrepreneurship

The first round table will focus on contemporary forms of legitimation of entrepreneurship and management . Making the honor of the theme of innovation and creativity will be an opportunity here to draw on the work of Boltanski and Thévenot Chiapello on new forms of legitimation of economic activities and "The new spirit of capitalism "by questioning the contemporary forms of justification and promotion of the company.
This will return about erasing old terminology in favor of stories: loss of boss the benefit of the contractor, promotion management textbooks "actor network" capable of carrying out "projects" , recovery of "mobility", "skills" of the worker ...
If the analysis of text corpora is of course a relevant method to account for this continuous updating of the vocabulary entrepreneurial, priority will be given to proposals particularly communication on how these forms of legitimacy embodied also and foremost in practical devices: financial products supposedly "ethical" promotion prize "green" businesses, shows the "entrepreneur" books highlighting " the social economy, "sociologists of work and organizations promoting" management by competencies, "consulting firms" social negotiation "
... It will be understood more than just speeches or rhetorical forms, it is well institutions and actors promoting a "new spirit Business "which will be used here for analysis and discussion.

Axis 2: Training and reproduction of elites between innovations and changes

long training of elites in France has been closely associated with the system of high schools and, consequently, the State was the principal officer and beneficiary. Thus, the study of the formation of elites could easily reach a sociology of the state, including its central government. Different processes seem
however challenging this model these years. First, the state service is less and less searched, less time at least, by the new members of the great body pantouflent increasingly earlier and more definitive. Then there is a strong phenomenon of empowerment great schools vis-à-vis large body: questioning the principle of "boot", contests output changing lessons without consultation with line ministries, focusing partnerships in American universities ... Alongside this, the major business schools who occupied a position of relative marginal in the universe of large schools tend to be increasingly recognized, often in combination with another major school as ENA. Finally, the development of curriculum abroad (especially in Anglo-Saxon universities), the rise of the disciplines of management (in business schools as the University) and the weakening of some traditional training (such that the curriculum of law) contribute to a redistribution of resources and positions in the school world.
What do these trends? Assists Is there a renewal of the French elites or, rather, their adaptation to changes of the moment: the withdrawal of the state, the rise of private finance and globalization?
can then examine the specifics of such training schools operated by large, in terms of training other elite national, European and international or local, especially in the context of traffic from one scale to another.
In this sense, we are interested in diversity and redefinitions of types of resources that contribute to the production of elites as social background, holding economic capital and cultural routes and relationships abroad, scientific disciplines mastered, the first professional experiences valued, etc..
Finally we may wonder to what extent the policies of affirmative action (quotas for women on electoral lists and boards) are not disturbed or conventional circuits for producing elite.

Axis 3: Elites and Social Stratification: between line breeding and new forms of social mobility
This third and last area of discussion will cover the new forms of social stratification within the dominant groups, and mobility processes that characterize them, extending the analysis to a perspective of "global" or international.
It will first be asked to what extent the terms "traditional" reproducing dominant categories (transmission of family arrangements and heritage, socialization in separate universes, etc..) Or not affected by the dynamics socio-economic progress: economic globalization and in particular "emergence" of new national elites, and financial crisis challenge to Western domination, increasing competition nationally and international education, dissemination of new cultural goods (mainly because of technological innovation) and transformation of lifestyles. Reproduction positions based on family, heritage, values, she is stronger than ever or, conversely, several new trends are they likely to mitigate the centrality?
We will also ask to what extent access to dominant positions in France and other countries, was "closed" or otherwise "open" during the last period, specifying any differences cross: Do we observe, for example, closure of access to popular categories leading political positions, a tightening of the recruitment base of large schools (and why?), the appearance and the assertion in the economic universe of new elites employed "meritocratic" in very high income (traders, athletes, artists grand public, etc..)? Which sectors are the most "open" and, conversely, the more "closed" access to "new entrants"?
Quantitative analysis on changes in income inequality, wealth, but also that of social differentiation in terms of consumption and lifestyle among the dominant groups will identify major trends characteristic of relations between the different fractions or sectors: increasing power elites of finance since the 1980s, the relative decline of the senior civil service, academia and intellectual transformation of "social values" in favor of economic and managerial elites. They will also discuss the reality of differentiations increasing internal within each sector, their nature and their causes: the effect of competition policies, new forms of remuneration and career management, etc..
attention may finally be paid to methodological issues surrounding these issues. How to measure mobility and inequality within groups sometimes seemingly homogenous? How to account for the emergence of new dividing lines and "barriers" internal? How to describe and measure the unequal resources that can draw on different social groups?

Paper proposals can be sent to Sylvain Laurens is in charge of centralizing the proposals for the office of RT sociology of elites ( sylvainlaurens@free.fr )

T3000 Hp Ethernet Controller

knowledge

Policies knowledge

Networks, practices, actors

University of Limoges, FSLH, Department of Sociology

Thursday 14 and Friday, October 15, 2010 (morning)

Symposium offered by the University of Limoges, Grescoe, the French Association of Sociology and thematic networks

27 (Sociology of Intellectuals and expertise: knowledge and power),

29 (Science and Technical society: knowledge, practices, tools and institutions) and

42 (Sociology of elites)

Thursday, October 14 9 am Opening

Yvon Lamy (University of Limoges, Grescoe)

Laurent Jeanpierre (University Paris 8, Labtop / RT 27, AFS)

9:30 to 11:15

Practical expertise in conflict

Moderation: Shukri Benayed, University of Limoges, Grescoe

Yvon Lamy, University of Limoges, Grescoe

by the Governing knowledge in the arts: the Regional Cultural Observatories

Samuel Bouron, CURAPP - Grescoe

How the National Joint Committee on Employment of journalists "recognize" schools of journalism?

Corinne Delmas, University of Lille 2, CERAPS, UMR CNRS 8026

A hybrid place of expertise: The Centre of stress and mobility forced France Telecom

11:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m.

Networks and Places "neutral" between knowledge and power

Moderation: Romain Pudal (Cesspit - Paris)

Marie Clotilde Meillerand, LARHRA, UMR 5190

knowledge in the service of urban planning: the movement Economy and Humanism , 1940-1960

Ryoufreit Thibaut, IEP Lyon, Laboratoire Triangle, UMR 5206

The mobilization of knowledge in the production Socialist Program

Anaïs Théviot, IEP Bordeaux SPIRIT

Inside Look at Terra Nova

Lunch

2:30 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. The rise of a managerial paradigm Government

Moderation: Ashveen Peerbaye (University of Paris-Marne-la-Vallée)

Odile Henry, University Paris Dauphine, and IRISSO Cesspit

rationalization of the French economy: neutral sites and knowledge production, 1926-1942

Antoine Derouet, Centre Maurice Halbwachs, Team PRO, EHESS

From organization to management: the contribution of the National Organization French training "administrative" engineers

Michel Daccache, Cesspit / CEMAGREF, Grenoble

The "science of risk 'between knowledge and power. Genesis production, uses and social functions of cindyniques

4:30 p.m. to 6:15 p.m.

govern by economics?

Moderation: Stephen Pénissat (CERAPS, University of Lille 2)

Depecker Thomas, INRA, ALISS

From beef to work on the health worker: economic ethics of nutritional requirements in the nineteenth century

Sabine Rozier, Université Picardie Jules Verne - CURAPP-CNRS

market educator. From citizen to consumer notice: survey on education Economic and financial public

Thomas Angeletti, MPSG, EHESS

The days to stabilize the economy

Friday, October 15

9:30 to 11:15

State Science and Technology

Moderator: Laurent Jeanpierre (Labtop, University Paris 8)

Delimitsos Konstantinos, University of Nancy 2, 2L2S, stains [subject]

Circulation of terms between normative decision makers and new security experts

Gildas Tanguy IEP Toulouse LASSP

Report to the Department ... The prefects and manufacture of administrative reports: institutionalization and systematization of knowledge bureaucratic (1880-1940)

Stephen Pénissat, CERAPS, University Lille 2

"The History is made without us ", or how econometrics supplanted expertise in the sociology of State. For the Department of Labour (1970-2000).

symposium organized with the support of the town of Limoges, Limousin Regional Council, University of Limoges - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, the French Association of Sociology of the RT 27, 29 and 42 of the French Association of Sociology and Grescoe.

Scientific Committee: Philippe Brunet, Eric Dagiral, François-Xavier Dudouet, Aisling Healy, Odile Henry Wiebke Keim, Laurent Jeanpierre, Yvon Lamy Sylvain Laurens, Frédéric Lebaron, Olivier Martin, Romain Pudal, Ashveen Peerbaye Catherine Vilkas Dominique Vinck.

Argument

The problem of the function of knowledge in the construction of social order, in the acts of government and policy conduct and behavior is a recurring issue in sociology as a science policy. This conference aims to bring this issue by focusing specifically on the movement and use, but also to the production of knowledge in areas not scholars. Generally, it will be to ask what skills and knowledge which are now more legitimate in the worlds political and administrative, but also economic and managers, and it is possible to affirm that statecraft or dominated by knowledge tends to develop gradually, or even to replace other forms of government or more direct exercise of power.

While the government by the knowledge that in recent years been the subject of much research in political science, for example in the context of public policy analysis, including consideration of the social construction of public problems , you ask here these phenomena from complementary perspectives: those of the sociology of elites, the sociology of science and technology and sociology of intellectuals and expertise. And is expected to shed new light to places less central in the production of policies and sometimes beyond approaches monosectoral of public action. It is also expected to stress the social implementation of these forms of power rather than their own technical and institutional aspects. It will finally move beyond the image given by the generic category of Foucauldian "government" to clarify the forms of exercising power made possible by the accumulation, circulation and release forms of specific knowledge.

policies of knowledge can be understood along three pathways that tend to be combined in analysis to be proposed. These three entry points are, of course, not exhaustive and does not purport to exhaust the investigation.

(1) knowledge policies refer first to a topography places of production and circulation. We will focus on the networks of expertise but also to "neutral site" or hybrids which bring together actors with lifestyles and thinking and social properties usually heterogeneous and remote, as intellectuals and leaders Business, unionists and scientists, etc.. Work on social forms of think tank, the "observatory" social or economic, regional or national level, the clusters on the intellectual journals or specialist at the borders of several social worlds will be particularly welcome in this frame. Medium term views on the historical evolution of social interactions of these "neutral site" will also be appreciated as well as a reflection on the effects of legitimacy from the very name of these places and these environments.

(2) The political knowledge through a multiplicity of technologies . This is probably the one that has generated the most social science research in recent years, as we consider the historical study of the science of government, sociology, statistics and indicators, to search benchmarking, the "factory of public opinion," the instruments of public policy, measurement and risk management, etc.. We focus here in particular to the training process, legitimation and institutionalization of these techniques and knowledge and it will also consider the differences between the uses of intellectual techniques and technical material.

(3) These techniques and networks that form new ways to govern and dominate, however, are activated and used the following strategies actors that sociological analysis must to reconstruct. For this reason, we will pay particular attention to the training of elite political and administrative elites, but also scientific, intellectual and actors of expertise. It will also address many Conflict assessment or measurement (like unemployment or welfare) and their effects as well as the mobilization of knowledge through social movements or groups with a critical ambition. The logic of the social-cons expertise and collective self-expertise (in some surveys as workers) could therefore also be analyzed. One wonders what kind of intellectual engagement directories are mobilized when to use knowledge in the political or administrative.